Risk of disease.

A board for news and views on what's happening in the world

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Kaz » 13 Feb 2014, 16:40

Monday is the expected highest point, if the Thames 'goes' then - as has been put to my ex as a possibility by a Bod In The Know he was talking to, but thankfully not a probability - the whole of Egham will be flooded - houses, businesses, fields the lot :?

Milliband is a disaster. We know exactly what he doesn't stand for - ie anything the Tories say or do - but just what he does stand for is a mystery. He is a total non-entity, with the leadership qualities of a stuffed poodle :roll: Oh and why his mother didn't have his adenoids 'done' as a child I will never know! :roll: :roll: :lol:
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby KateLMead » 13 Feb 2014, 18:05

Ah well as one. As one would say.....
"Nil Illegitimi Carborundum"
User avatar
KateLMead
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:11

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Kaz » 13 Feb 2014, 18:39

Absolutely!!!! 8-) ;)
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby moondancer » 13 Feb 2014, 22:56

debih wrote:
Where exactly would they pump the water to? If the rivers are bursting their banks and flooding the surrounding area, then what do you do with all the excess water. You can't pump it back into the river can you?

I'm not being sarcastic here - I genuinely do wonder where they are expected to remove the water to.


That's exactly what puzzles me too.

If one house pumps water away, won't it all go to the next house and from there have a domino effect ?

It can't go back into the rivers because they're all overflowing anyway.
moondancer
 
Posts: 109
Joined: 19 Jan 2014, 11:26

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby TheOstrich » 13 Feb 2014, 23:36

I think, on one level, they are using pumps to divert water into different channels and rivers so it returns to the sea faster ...

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... nel-floods

... and on a much more localised level, if you have a flood barrier round or alongside your house, and water is getting inside it or coming up from the ground, you can pump it back over the barrier into the main-stream flood (think of it as bailing out a dingy). It's to stop the flood waters rising in your house/land to the same level as the flood waters outside your barrier, and thus hopefully minimising the damage in your ground floor / basement. It's what some folk living by the side of the rivers Severn and Thames have been doing.

http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ho ... 31644.aspx is an informative read, with a lot of cautions about using pumps ....
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7582
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Workingman » 14 Feb 2014, 10:57

The first inch of water in a flood is the one that does the most damage. It gets into the foundations, the joists, the floorboards and laminates and carpets; and due to capillary action it will rise up the walls until gravity takes over.

If that first inch is groundwater and has reached the level of the surrounding groundwater, then pumping it out is a waste of time, money, fuel and effort.

If the water has broken through household defences then the breach has to be found and repaired at the same time as the pumping is taking place. Water is so corrosive, as far as loose barriers are concerned, that the pump and repair process could need to happen untill the waters subside.

As I remember it an explanation for the pumps at Burrowbridge was that are helping to drain the levels lying below the level of the river itself and at a point where it can flow away. They appear to be struggling because they do not have the capacity.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby meriad » 14 Feb 2014, 16:43

A colleague and I were talking about the Thames today - I walk over Hungerford Bridge on a daily basis and I can see the Thames from my office window. And at no point have we had a very high water level and when its low tide it's still really quite low...

Why can whoever it is in charge not - when the tide starts receding in the tidal part of the Thames - open some of the locks so water can start running down into the emptying river and run into the Channel?
User avatar
meriad
 
Posts: 9407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 09:42
Location: Send, Surrey

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Kaz » 14 Feb 2014, 17:27

Good question Ria! :? :roll:
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Workingman » 14 Feb 2014, 18:20

meriad wrote:Why can whoever it is in charge not - when the tide starts receding in the tidal part of the Thames - open some of the locks so water can start running down into the emptying river and run into the Channel?


Bloody good question! Teddington is the tidal lock and it is only a few km from Egham, Chertsey etc. There must be a reason, but it escapes me.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Diflower » 14 Feb 2014, 18:24

Sounds good to me - don't we have any residential lock/tidal experts? :? :D
User avatar
Diflower
 
Posts: 16148
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 22:10

PreviousNext

Return to News and Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests