I am not the slightest bit bothered by a person going through transgender surgery. In fact if it helps their mental state and makes them feel more comfortable in themselves then, providing thorough checks are made to establish that happiness, why not?
However, whilst such procedures make them look and act like the opposite sex they are not biologically so and never will be. That obviously causes problems in law, which is how this all started.
But to get back to my OP. Vicky Thomson was a man. "She" might have been known by a female name, worn female clothes and 'identified' as a woman, but she was still a man.
Her solicitor, Mr Hussain, described Ms Thompson, who had not undergone gender reassignment surgery, as a vulnerable transgender person.
A vulnerable individual, no doubt about that, and one needing care.
As for Tara Hudson, the story beggars belief.
"Her" trail heard a very drunk Hudson had headbutted bar manager Christopher Dyer after she was refused any more alcohol. Mr Dyer needed £1,500 worth of dental surgery following the attack.
Definitely deserving of a prison sentence, but where?
Well, Ms Hudson also goes by the name Tia Star. Unlike 'her' alter-ego she is not a make up artist but a 'shemale' escort, as her advert proclaims.
“I’m Tia Star a British born shemale/transexual model and escort” “BIG bouncy 34E boobs – leggy 5’10 – 7 inch surprise – ***** **** *** ****”. Edited so as not to offend.
Six years of TG manipulation might have removed facial hair, botoxed the lips and eyebrows, pumped up the boob job enhanced boobs, but the family jewels are still in place.
Imagine you are a female prisoner taking a shower and in walk Vicky and Tara with their dangly bits still in place.....