Suff wrote:Is it only me?
Absolutely not!
The people of the UK, through Parliament, put the brakes on a definite US attack on Syria a few weekends back. Had it not been for us we would now be in the second week of God-knows-what. I call that influential.
Obama's red line, "his" red line, suddenly became the US's red line. It has now morphed into a global red line. Rather than just taking an executive decision to attack Syria, Obama is having to persuade others, including his own Congress and Senate, that a red line exists. WE made all this happen.
However, we are still trying to be persuaded that we were wrong. The BBC is at the forefront of this with its endless articles and coverage of the American side of the argument. Frank Gardner, probaly one of the best defence reporters, has barely touched on the Russian position, though he did mention their prescence in Syria in passing. We have not had a peep out of Lyse Doucet or Jeremy Bowen on that score. Tim Marshall and Sam Kiley on Sky have been a bit more even handed, but not much.
Only Digby Jones, of all the commentators, has so far mentioned the Russian need for a warm water port in the Med as a driving factor in Putin's position....... his point was quietly given a body swerve by the rest of the panel. Maybe the news that elements of the Russian navy have set sail for Tartus will start to wake them up. Thing is, they won't find the news in the Western media, they'll have to go look elsewhere.