Page 1 of 1

The end of free speech?

PostPosted: 14 Mar 2016, 13:45
by Workingman
This time it is Joan Bakewell.

Yesterday she told the times:
that anorexia was "one example of the way [young] people have become very self-regarding".

She said: "I am alarmed by anorexia among young people, which arises presumably because they are preoccupied with being beautiful and healthy and thin.

"No one has anorexia in societies where there is not enough food.

"They do not have anorexia in the camps in Syria. I think it's possible anorexia could be about narcissism."

It did not take long for the "professionally offended on behalf of others" brigades to lambaste her on TwitFace to the point where she felt that she had to go all mea maxima culpa with this:
I did not expect the [Sunday Times] to quote my views on anorexia and am full of regret that my reported views have caused distress. I am deeply sorry.


Why?

Why is she sorry? Are we not allowed to express views others disagree with? Is there some law that says we have to apologise and whip ourselves publicly with willow branches to make amends?

I would have preferred it if Bakewell had stood up to the 'digital' mobs and explained what she meant. If they then did not like it: tough.

These incidents are happening too frequently for us to be comfortable with.

Re: The end of free speech?

PostPosted: 14 Mar 2016, 14:20
by Suff
Sadly the P.O. are having their day in the sun. They can, literally, destroy people who are in the public space.

Time the Professionally Offended were told to get on with it and that their offense is far, far, less than the offense they give to others by being so intolerant…

Re: The end of free speech?

PostPosted: 15 Mar 2016, 10:30
by cromwell
We don't really have free speech in this country and haven't had for years. The politicians have deliberately reduced what is and isn't acceptable.

Diversity! In everything but allowable opinions, that is.

Re: The end of free speech?

PostPosted: 15 Mar 2016, 12:52
by Workingman
Don't forget social media and "group think".

It only takes one to be right-on and with-it and the sheep will follow. Anyone who disagrees is a racist, xenophobic bigot with fascistic tendencies and quite possibly a homophobe and Islamaphobe to boot.

Re: The end of free speech?

PostPosted: 15 Mar 2016, 13:22
by Suff
Workingman wrote:Don't forget social media and "group think".

It only takes one to be right-on and with-it and the sheep will follow. Anyone who disagrees is a racist, xenophobic bigot with fascistic tendencies and quite possibly a homophobe and Islamaphobe to boot.


I thought I'd go and look up fascistic tendencies.. I found this...

Fascists view World War I as having made liberal democracy obsolete, and regard total mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[7] Such a state is led by a strong leader — such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party — to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.[7] Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation.[8][9][10][11] Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky through protectionist and interventionist economic policies.[12]


I'd say that was either absolute monarchy or USSR communism myself. Both of which are supported in the UK, especially by certain politicians...

All of these labelling name callers are not in my "favour" book...