Give it a rest!
Posted: 10 Jan 2017, 16:15
MPs want a law to make sure that 45% of the parliamentary candidates from any party are women. The reason being that women make up half the population.
Well if we follow that logic should there not be minimums for blacks, Asian, Catholics, Muslims, left-handers, homosexuals (both genders), tall, short, fat or thin?
I have this novel idea for them to consider: the best person for the job becomes the candidate. If that happens to be a black left-handed lesbian then she gets chosen.
Of course getting to be a candidate is one thing, getting enough votes to win a seat is another. Maybe the MPs have plans to make a vote for a woman worth more than for a man, just to make sure. The formula would have to be different for each constituency and the number of votes cast, but I am sure they can come up with something to get 45% of all MPs women, regardless of how good, bad or indifferent they are, into the Commons.
"If the Commons is serious about being truly representative of the people that it seeks to represent, it must rise to the challenge of being a world leader on women's parliamentary representation."
Well if we follow that logic should there not be minimums for blacks, Asian, Catholics, Muslims, left-handers, homosexuals (both genders), tall, short, fat or thin?
I have this novel idea for them to consider: the best person for the job becomes the candidate. If that happens to be a black left-handed lesbian then she gets chosen.
Of course getting to be a candidate is one thing, getting enough votes to win a seat is another. Maybe the MPs have plans to make a vote for a woman worth more than for a man, just to make sure. The formula would have to be different for each constituency and the number of votes cast, but I am sure they can come up with something to get 45% of all MPs women, regardless of how good, bad or indifferent they are, into the Commons.