Workingman wrote:Cromwell wrote:I think we should remember that the TV news on general hates the Tory party and gleefully seizes on any opportunity to slag them off.
Example? Boris Johnson and the lady imprisoned in Iran.
He's the Foreign Secretary, FCOL, he should get his facts right before gobbing off. He is supposed to help British nationals imprisoned abroad not make their situations worse. His latest gaff could break up a family and put the future of an innocent child in jeopardy.
How he remains in the Cabinet is a complete mystery... unless he has info on the others. Hmm
Here's a thing. There has been a lot of fulminating about what Johnson said - but what did he actually say?
a) "It's a fair cop guv, she shouldn't have had that semtex in her handbag".
b) "Well, you spy on us".
or c) "She was merely teaching journalists"
Yes, it was c. Which is not imo a resigning issue. (The lady was on holiday we are told.)
As Suff points out, Johnson is popular. Which is very unpopular with the tv people. So he gets a constant trashing.
Consider this. If Boris Johnson had said the terror attacks were "part and parcel of living in a big city", what would the BBC's reaction have been? They didn't say anthing when Sadiq Khan said it, but I would bet against a similar trappist silence if Johnson had said it.
If Boris Johnson had been caught on video boasting about having unprotected sex with male prostitutes and offering to buy them class A drugs, what would the BBC have had to say? It's been a year since Keith Vaz was caught doing this. The parliamentary investigation still hasn't finished one year later! Would the BBC or Sky be so silent if it had been Johnson caught with his trousers down? Like hell.
If he had been caught advertising himself in crude language on a dating website like Chris Bryant, would Sky and the BBC have defended him? No.
The BBC have an agenda. They are pushing it.
And their main weapon is outrage - even if it is very selective outrage.