Is it worth getting mad about?
Posted: 26 Jan 2018, 17:12
I've been reading the press quite closely on the economy due to the rapid rise of the £ against both the € and the $. Not before time I should say, however the reality that the £ is close to where it stood against the $ just before the Brexit vote, yet stands hugely below where it stood against the €; just grates. It's not going to change but it does.
However when I read this article by citywire Money, all my ire at those who constantly undervalue the UK came out in smoking anger.
What am I talking about?
Well it starts with.
Ok so that's old news. The UK economy has been overperforming analysts expectations ever since Cameron came into power the first time. Yet underperformed every year Blair was in power. Stats were consistently revised down under Blair and Up under Cameron.
But when we get to.
Let me see. The UK has been a strong, vibrant, economy for decades now. Given the fact that the IMF, the CBI, the EU, the Lib Dems and Labour have been talking the UK economy DOWN for over a year now, it is still totally unsurprising that the UK economy overperfomed against analysts expectations. If the UK HAD dropped to, or below, expectations, it would have been momentous, such is the nature of the power of our economy.
However this is not what drove me over the edge. It was this.
I was hard put not to start shouting at my mobile. But as I was in a public place at the time it would not have been quite right.
But why am I so exercised about that statement?
Well let's see. According to Wikipedia, the list of economies runs to:
IMF 191
World Bank 194
UN 211
Where is the UK?
FIFTH!
So what does that make the rest of the world? Insignificant? So we are now calling the economies of France, Italy and Spain; SMALL. So what do we call Switzerland? Insignificant?
So in order for the UK to be a small economy, then a large economy needs to be? After all we have two choices. Why two? Well in order for an economy to be large it would have to be at least twice the size of the UK? Right?? That leaves?
China
The US.
In ascending order of size.
This is the kind of Remainer BS I have been calling out as BS for two years now. It does not, however, go away and it ALWAYS gets printed as a throw away fact by Remainer press.
When I look at the UK I see the fifth largest economy in the world, the third most powerful military and one of FIVE permanent seats on the UN security council.
When a remainer looks at the UK, it would appear, they see a weak, dependent, nation; which should be apologist and rely on others in order to survive.
Is it any wonder I get mad?
However when I read this article by citywire Money, all my ire at those who constantly undervalue the UK came out in smoking anger.
What am I talking about?
Well it starts with.
The pound has continued its strong run against the dollar after news of a better-than-expected performance from the UK economy in the last three months of 2017.
Ok so that's old news. The UK economy has been overperforming analysts expectations ever since Cameron came into power the first time. Yet underperformed every year Blair was in power. Stats were consistently revised down under Blair and Up under Cameron.
But when we get to.
'It's certainly fair to say the economy has performed much better than many feared in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, boosted by the rising tide of a global recovery which has lifted all boats,' said Ben Brettell, senior economist at Hargreaves Lansdown.
Let me see. The UK has been a strong, vibrant, economy for decades now. Given the fact that the IMF, the CBI, the EU, the Lib Dems and Labour have been talking the UK economy DOWN for over a year now, it is still totally unsurprising that the UK economy overperfomed against analysts expectations. If the UK HAD dropped to, or below, expectations, it would have been momentous, such is the nature of the power of our economy.
However this is not what drove me over the edge. It was this.
'This is not impressive for a small, open economy that would normally expect to be benefiting from 2017's healthy global pick-up,' said Lucy O'Carroll, chief economist at Aberdeen Standard Investments.
I was hard put not to start shouting at my mobile. But as I was in a public place at the time it would not have been quite right.
But why am I so exercised about that statement?
Well let's see. According to Wikipedia, the list of economies runs to:
IMF 191
World Bank 194
UN 211
Where is the UK?
FIFTH!
So what does that make the rest of the world? Insignificant? So we are now calling the economies of France, Italy and Spain; SMALL. So what do we call Switzerland? Insignificant?
So in order for the UK to be a small economy, then a large economy needs to be? After all we have two choices. Why two? Well in order for an economy to be large it would have to be at least twice the size of the UK? Right?? That leaves?
China
The US.
In ascending order of size.
This is the kind of Remainer BS I have been calling out as BS for two years now. It does not, however, go away and it ALWAYS gets printed as a throw away fact by Remainer press.
When I look at the UK I see the fifth largest economy in the world, the third most powerful military and one of FIVE permanent seats on the UN security council.
When a remainer looks at the UK, it would appear, they see a weak, dependent, nation; which should be apologist and rely on others in order to survive.
Is it any wonder I get mad?