Shoes for men...
Posted: 28 Jun 2024, 18:50
OK, trainers, if you must.
Nike profits have gone down 10% and it's market value fell $15bn.
It's not surprising given their price. Adult sizes are way over £120 for something that will not last - there might be a pun in there somewhere. People are paying for a "Name" not quality or style. Very few people "train" or "run" in them, they are daywear and there are alternatives.
I am 71 and I wear trainers in the summer because they are light and comfortable... and I'm in shorts - shoes do not look right, a bit like sandals and socks! I prefer the fit of Adidas or Puma; and the price. In winter I wear shoes. I have three pairs of Doc Martens shoes of varying age and colours and a pair of boots, they will last forever, a bonus is that they are non-slip on icy pavements and snow. I got my DM boots when I was in the RAF so they must be well over 40 years old and they are still going strong. However, like Trigger's broom, I have had to replace the laces a few times.
Nike profits have gone down 10% and it's market value fell $15bn.
It's not surprising given their price. Adult sizes are way over £120 for something that will not last - there might be a pun in there somewhere. People are paying for a "Name" not quality or style. Very few people "train" or "run" in them, they are daywear and there are alternatives.
I am 71 and I wear trainers in the summer because they are light and comfortable... and I'm in shorts - shoes do not look right, a bit like sandals and socks! I prefer the fit of Adidas or Puma; and the price. In winter I wear shoes. I have three pairs of Doc Martens shoes of varying age and colours and a pair of boots, they will last forever, a bonus is that they are non-slip on icy pavements and snow. I got my DM boots when I was in the RAF so they must be well over 40 years old and they are still going strong. However, like Trigger's broom, I have had to replace the laces a few times.