Page 1 of 2
Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 10:19
by KateLMead
I wrote about the Harman's association with Paedophiles and their Uman Rites.. Had little response , probably due to my hogging the board or maybe the subject aroused little interest. It has been suggested could have funded the paedophile lobby group. Hewitt another who stated that the age of consent for children should be lowered to 10 years of age.and that wonderful couple Harriet Harman and the man her other half who prefers to be called Jack Dromey.
quote..
The now dog eared 1982 magazine un earthed in archives was the quarterly magazine unearthed in archives, was the quarterly Journal of the National Council of Civil Liberties. Known as a radical campaigning organisation the NCCL , the well known Lobby group is called Liberty. The campaigne that year was being run by three tub thumping young left wingers who would rise to extremely senior positions in the Labour part..
Read the article in the DM and form your own opinions. All denied of course, by the Harmans and Hewitt. Daily Mail today.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 10:22
by Kaz
I'll probably be buying the Mail later - I honestly buy it for the superb cryptic crossword and code word puzzles which I try to do daily, but I sometimes read the news articles too
I will read it as you suggest
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 10:30
by KateLMead
Kaz wrote:I'll probably be buying the Mail later - I honestly buy it for the superb cryptic crossword and code word puzzles which I try to do daily, but I sometimes read the news articles too
I will read it as you suggest
Brain wont function when it comes to cross words these days. neighbour comes for coffee and asks whether she can do it.. I agree
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 11:03
by Workingman
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... avile.htmlHarman, Dromey, Hewitt.
It is absolutely correct for the police to investigate, without fear or favour. Whether that will be the case remains to be seen, but if there isa paperwork trail it must be followed.
Let's face it, this is a lot more serious than going after a few touchy-feely DJs/actors, but the CPS thought that arrest and charges were the way to go. Now we will see if there is any consistency.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 14:22
by KateLMead
Couldn't agree more Frank. I was shocked when I learned of these accusations and their associations with these paedophiles around six months ago? As for Hewitt (she left in a hurry) I never thought anything of her, and I certainly have never had any time for Madame Dromey and her left wing old man. Utterly nauseating individuals.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 15:18
by Kaz
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 15:47
by KateLMead
These accusations were voiced many, many months ago, little reaction followed. One would think that the privacy/ secrecy laws still stand.
One thing about The Mail, is that they will pursue injustices that other national newspapers ignore. Their fights for justice have extended to revealing the failures in the NHS. Pathway.. Paedophilia. neglect and cruelty of the aged in old peoples homes. Naming and shaming schools and children's homes where children have been proved to have been abused. The terrible violence and Cruelty in institutions to mentally handicapped children and adults.., and many, many more causes. My husband was a Telegraph reader. One as far as I was concerned having short arms the pages were (are too big) And I like the Mail, it has excellent medical sections at the beginning of each week and it exposes the shameful situations that exist where other newspapers fear to tread.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
19 Feb 2014, 22:29
by Aggers
I can't think of anything more vile that an adult violating a small child.
I can, to some extent, accept that some under-aged girls can look old enough, and in fact might
even encourage such actions, but when there can be no doubt that she is obviously still a child
then criminal proceedings must be taken and severe punishments handed out to the offenders.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
20 Feb 2014, 07:43
by KateLMead
Aggers wrote:I can't think of anything more vile that an adult violating a small child.
I can, to some extent, accept that some under-aged girls can look old enough, and in fact might
even encourage such actions, but when there can be no doubt that she is obviously still a child
then criminal proceedings must be taken and severe punishments handed out to the offenders.
Ten year old children never look old enough, we had the case of those children abused who reside in children's homes of late, the case where they were groomed by gangs, drugged up and threatened if they didn't comply these are the Paedophiles approved by this nauseating foul bunch of Human Rights activists. Only those little ones who have suffered at the hands of Paedophiles or a Paedophile as children know the terror and threats installed into the child's mind, something that lives with them for the rests of their days.
Re: Oh Dear Filling the page again.!
Posted:
25 Feb 2014, 10:11
by cromwell
Bumping this because old Hattie Harperson has come over all outraged about the "smear campaign" being waged against her. Here's a link to an article in the Telegraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/1065 ... orted.htmlThis bit is especially interesting:
"NCCL vigorously opposed new cornerstone child abuse legislation. In a letter to the Home Office in April 1978, it argued fiercely that child pornography should not be banned as “indecent” unless it could be shown that the child depicted had been harmed. The NCCL official who wrote this letter was its legal officer, Harriet Harman"
I will bet my house that as yet she has not been asked about this letter by TV news.