Perceptions
Posted: 08 Jul 2014, 11:23
It seems my grumpiness is still not over.
Perceptions. UK ingrowing idiocy in other words.
I read this article and was inclined to do a little checking and comparison. Because 4%, year on year, is about the maximum we could expect a controlled expansion of the economy to sustain. It we were to hit 8% the BOE would be rising rates and rising them sharply to 5% or more. Consider the impact to mortgages. The disaster for people who thought 3% mortgages would last forever....
I did a small comparison. It is expected that the long term growth for the Eurozone is going to be fairly flat for the rest of the next 10 years. So if the Eurozone remained flat and the UK grew at 4% or, more likely, the Eurozone sits at 1% and the UK at 5%, what would the impact be?
Well it would mean the UK GDP would be larger than Germany at the end of that decade. In fact, if it continued, it would be larger than Japan and the 3rd largest in the world in just 19 years. Japan and the Eurozone remaining fairly static and the US/Asia growing around the same pace. Japanese GDP fell sharply in 2013 and continues to be fairly flat. So it's not that much of a supposition.
4% is NOT a disaster.
Also, looking at June, German output dropped, France fell back into negative growth, the Eurozone quarter on quarter growth will only be 0.3% to 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Q1. contrast the UK at 0.8% in Q1 and possibly 0.8% again in Q2. Fully 4 times the growth of the Eurozone in Q1 and at least twice the Eurozone growth in Q2. Also, it seems, German manufacturing back orders kept Q2 growth high but the orders fell in Q2 meaning that Q3 growth for Germany and the Eurozone will be lower than expected.
Let's face it. 4% is VERY GOOD. 3.7% for a year is also VERY GOOD. We would not want to grow any faster. If we hit 10% GDP growth, inflation would probably rise to as high as 15%. Meaning very high interest rates. Fast growth is BAD.
So why does the Guardian post a "The sky is falling" post on the economy? Because it looks bad for the government.
My ire continues.
Perceptions. UK ingrowing idiocy in other words.
I read this article and was inclined to do a little checking and comparison. Because 4%, year on year, is about the maximum we could expect a controlled expansion of the economy to sustain. It we were to hit 8% the BOE would be rising rates and rising them sharply to 5% or more. Consider the impact to mortgages. The disaster for people who thought 3% mortgages would last forever....
I did a small comparison. It is expected that the long term growth for the Eurozone is going to be fairly flat for the rest of the next 10 years. So if the Eurozone remained flat and the UK grew at 4% or, more likely, the Eurozone sits at 1% and the UK at 5%, what would the impact be?
Well it would mean the UK GDP would be larger than Germany at the end of that decade. In fact, if it continued, it would be larger than Japan and the 3rd largest in the world in just 19 years. Japan and the Eurozone remaining fairly static and the US/Asia growing around the same pace. Japanese GDP fell sharply in 2013 and continues to be fairly flat. So it's not that much of a supposition.
4% is NOT a disaster.
Also, looking at June, German output dropped, France fell back into negative growth, the Eurozone quarter on quarter growth will only be 0.3% to 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Q1. contrast the UK at 0.8% in Q1 and possibly 0.8% again in Q2. Fully 4 times the growth of the Eurozone in Q1 and at least twice the Eurozone growth in Q2. Also, it seems, German manufacturing back orders kept Q2 growth high but the orders fell in Q2 meaning that Q3 growth for Germany and the Eurozone will be lower than expected.
Let's face it. 4% is VERY GOOD. 3.7% for a year is also VERY GOOD. We would not want to grow any faster. If we hit 10% GDP growth, inflation would probably rise to as high as 15%. Meaning very high interest rates. Fast growth is BAD.
So why does the Guardian post a "The sky is falling" post on the economy? Because it looks bad for the government.
My ire continues.