I have always been consistent in my dislike of Apple
Posted: 04 Dec 2014, 17:36
Today I saw an Article about Apple being in court (again) and the little snippets which fall out every time that happens.
It reminded me of this old joke entitled if Operating Systems were Airlines. It's a bit rare for those not in the IT business and also for those who don't remember a time before WindowsXP.
The key part is the sarcastic take on Apple...
So when I saw this article today I thought I'd have a read.
What comes out of it is this:
And this
And the joker in the pack
I have been well aware that Apple plays these games. Ever since it decided that an application which was perfectly OK in the Apple store became persona non grata. So when they produced their next firmware update for their iPod's they disabled and removed the software. Software users had paid for.
I'm glad Apple is being hammered for this. I'm just unhappy that it's not being broadcast more widely. Given the recent discussion on Apples iOS "Autocorrect" rather than Autosuggest, I see that the Apple ethos, "you don't want to know, don't need to know" is alive and well.
My first Boss in Computing used to say to me "God protect me from forgiving systems". "Why" I would say. His reply was "When it goes wrong, how do I work out what it thought I was telling it to do?"
It reminded me of this old joke entitled if Operating Systems were Airlines. It's a bit rare for those not in the IT business and also for those who don't remember a time before WindowsXP.
The key part is the sarcastic take on Apple...
Mac Airways: The cashiers, flight attendants, and pilots all look the same, talk the same, and act the same. When you ask them questions about the flight, they reply that you don't want to know, don't need to know, and would you please return to your seat and watch the movie.
So when I saw this article today I thought I'd have a read.
What comes out of it is this:
Interesting nuggets of information tend to come out of Apple trials, and this week’s iTunes class-action courtroom drama is no exception. The plaintiffs claim Apple would delete songs downloaded from rival music services when iPod owners synced their devices to iTunes over a two-year period from 2007 to 2009.
And this
But the problem, Coughlin argued, is that Apple didn’t tell users which songs were potentially harmful. Instead, the company would push an error message telling the user to restore factory settings on the iPod and remove the offending files in the process.
And the joker in the pack
“We don’t need to give users too much information,” Farrugia offered by way of explanation.
I have been well aware that Apple plays these games. Ever since it decided that an application which was perfectly OK in the Apple store became persona non grata. So when they produced their next firmware update for their iPod's they disabled and removed the software. Software users had paid for.
I'm glad Apple is being hammered for this. I'm just unhappy that it's not being broadcast more widely. Given the recent discussion on Apples iOS "Autocorrect" rather than Autosuggest, I see that the Apple ethos, "you don't want to know, don't need to know" is alive and well.
My first Boss in Computing used to say to me "God protect me from forgiving systems". "Why" I would say. His reply was "When it goes wrong, how do I work out what it thought I was telling it to do?"