Well it didn't take long did it?
Posted: 19 Nov 2015, 21:37
That's less than a week and now the President of France and a bunch of other sources are saying that IS is trying to gain chemical weapons....
That would be WMD to you and me. Or Weapons of mass destruction...
Haven't we heard that one before?
The most likely place for IS to have gained WMD is from the rebels who took over a bunch of those stores from Assad. Remember Assad was forced to surrender his but the rebels were not....
I don't like convenient little stories which suddenly surface when action is the best political path. If true, we need to deal with it, certainly. But they didn't deal with it when they knew that Islamic fundamentalist rebels had taken them from Assad, including Al Qaeda.
If they want to convince me, they need to show the independently verified and dated reports from before the Paris attacks. We already have more than enough cause to bomb them off the face of the planet. Let's not get caught up on fairy stories which, when proven untrue, stop us from acting when we need to and leading to the kind of mess we are in now.
That would be WMD to you and me. Or Weapons of mass destruction...
Haven't we heard that one before?
The most likely place for IS to have gained WMD is from the rebels who took over a bunch of those stores from Assad. Remember Assad was forced to surrender his but the rebels were not....
I don't like convenient little stories which suddenly surface when action is the best political path. If true, we need to deal with it, certainly. But they didn't deal with it when they knew that Islamic fundamentalist rebels had taken them from Assad, including Al Qaeda.
If they want to convince me, they need to show the independently verified and dated reports from before the Paris attacks. We already have more than enough cause to bomb them off the face of the planet. Let's not get caught up on fairy stories which, when proven untrue, stop us from acting when we need to and leading to the kind of mess we are in now.