I do think many people are over-medicated.
On the other hand, many, many people are dreadfully unhealthy and the NHS is maybe helping to shore up their defences a little
WM of yours, I would definitely question why you're on Bp tablets when you've never had high Bp.
This has been a bugbear of mine this year. My Bp is taken every 4 weeks when I go for the jab, and is recorded on the little report they have to send my Gp.
Earlier this year she sent me a letter saying it was a bit high and I was to go to the nurse 3 weeks running to have it done; then that was 'high' so I had to wear a monitor for 24 hours.
She sent another letter saying the results were high and I should take Bp pills. I googled and didn't like the sound of possible side effects, so began questioning the other medical professionals I see.
The nurses at the local hospital, the oncologist, and the Macmillan lady all independently said categorically my Bp is not high, and is nowhere near where it should be medicated.
But Gp surgeries have targets. They get money for every patient for whom they bring it down by so many points.
I had been worrying that I was being stupidly stubborn, that I should just take them and be done with it - but with everyone except the Gp telling me it's completely unnecessary??
Also, I do now take aspirin - the 75mg, gastro-protective one. I take it because there is quite a lot of evidence it helps stop the spread of cancer, but as the Macmillan lady pointed out, it does a good job of preventing heart attacks and strokes, and with stomach-protection there are very few side effects.
And it's cheap
Personally, without high Bp or cholesterol, I'd ditch the Bp pills and statins, but it would be nice to have someone to talk it over with apart from your Gp, who, sad to say, has financial incentives for persuading you to carry on
Any time in the future there may be all sorts of drugs I have no choice but to take, but until then I have no interest in anything I'm not convinced is pretty much essential.