by Suff » 05 Feb 2013, 02:01
I'm not so black and white about this. I do recall some government scum... err Minister, telling the press that it was up to the pool of normal drivers of a vehicle as to whom was to take the points. There was discussion in the press as to whether this meant that families could choose to share the points in order to keep a main breadwinner on the road.
If that is true, as I remember this, then it is a change in government stance, spite in the case of a wife scorned and really very little to do with "perversion of the course of justice".
I'm going to add frilly knickers to the pink skirt I'm ordering for our country......
We are so UK insular about this. On Saturday night I had to explain to one of the dancers that Germany had an "advisory" speed limit on the Autobahns and that it was quite legal to drive at 200mph on a 2 lane autobahn with worse road surface and less hard shoulder than many UK dual carriageways. Also the fact that the number of deaths on Germany Autobahns, per vehicle travelling on them not per head of population (half of Europe drives on the Autobahns), is much lower than the UK.
This is a pure case of spite, press activism against an unpopular government and a legal system which says one thing one year and another thing the next and then bases prosecution of an old offense on the laws in place today as opposed to the laws in place at the time of the offense.
I'm not jumping on this whole Evil Scumbag bandwagon no matter how much I dislike his politics or his political affiliations. If his wife didn't want to take the ticket at the time she should have said so. To drag this up later to try and destroy his career, no matter how aggrieved she feels, is, to my mind, just wrong. In the end, in the dry legalese, she perverted the course of justice and he was an accessory.
Were I the judge I'd give her a 6 month custodial sentence and him a 3 month suspended, which does not ban him from sitting in parliament as he'd need a custodial sentence of more than 9 months for that.
Look at it logically here. What are they trying to stop? Wives taking the fine for the husband? The only way to do that is to make it prohibitively painful for the wife to do so.
I know it's not a popular position, but it's the way I feel.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.