Rodo wrote:I am no relgious zealot and neither am I a catholic, but I have to say I am quite shocked at the flippancy of some of the replies on here.
Shocked? I can just picture it.
Why be shocked? I guess to most of the world for whom the Pope, or Roman Catholicism, has no significance at all, it's just another piece of news that feeds humour or wry comments given the dubious recent history of that particular denomination. Magdalene homes; child abuse anyone?
Rodo wrote:It is a piece of news of great significance and great importance, to most of us anyway.
Of course it is, for
some.
Most of us? I doubt it. This is an increasingly secularised country/world and so most it will make no difference at all, unless maybe you're a priest who wants to marry, or a woman who needs an abortion, or a child who has been abused and wants people to be held to account, or . . . you hope for significant change for whatever the personal reasons.
To
most, it's of no more significance that the fact we now have a new Archbishop of Canterbury.
Lozzles wrote:I am a Catholic and I did expect flippancy. It is of great interest to me and I wonder what the coming months will bring.
Lozzles I'm sure. I know a lot of my Catholic friends were shocked by the news. Is there any significance in the fact he's
resigned rather than retired?