by Suff » 05 Sep 2016, 09:36
Yes this might be true.
Then again you might note, as I have done, that Marks and Spencer have put their toe back in the EU department store market with a new store in Brussels. This is fairly safe for them because the community in Brussels has extensive exposure to British goods and culture.
However M&S also had a large extension into France once upon a time. M&S, following standard British tactics, decided that France was not a good match for them and decided to exit. They negotiated with several possible companies until they found one to buy out the stores. Then, in secrecy and good British practise, they kept the deal close and announced it at a time of their convenience.
Shortly after this the French courts contacted the directors of M&S and invited them to come to France and explain why they had completely broken French Law, which insists that Union representatives be included in ANY negotiations for the sale of all or part of a company and that the Unions may go to their membership and veto any deal if they don't feel it is in their interests.
There is an extremely good reason why many of the companies choose the UK and not Europe, to invest in and operate from and it has less to do with the language than the restrictions on doing business.
Yes we may lose a chunk of our banking business, for a time, but not for as long as you might think. Currency and transaction restrictions will not allow. Remember the Eurozone agreed to a transaction tax the UK refused to accept. No company is going to move from a lower tax regime to a higher tax regime without significant inducements and those inducements are not even possible given the regulatory landscape of the EruoZone countries. The best they could hope for is Ireland and even there it's no picnic compared to the UK.
Right now those countries around the world are trying to pressurise the UK to accept punishing EU terms so that they can have an easy life. If they had taken a better assessment of the situation, the Brexit team and the new PM, they might find their attentions better presented to Brussels than the UK.
A lot of other world investment is in the UK to sell to the UK, not the EU. Witness Nissan and cars. They don't produce cars for Europe in the UK, all UK models are made in the UK or in Europe and shipped to the UK. The volume models are made in the UK and the others are made in Spain or Eastern Europe. However the Design, project control, testing and modelling are all done in the UK. These functions have nothing to do with manufacture and sales, these functions are independent of borders and also the UK has the largest pool of high quality staff in this area.
So when we look to the Nissan statements about the plant in Sunderland and the possible cutting of investment.... In fact the opposite could quite easily be true. All those RHD models made in Spain and Eastern Europe could, in the light of a bad Brexit negotiation, be moved to the UK. Ditto Renault, PSA, BMW, Mercedes etc......
It is far, far, too early to be talking about hard and fast decisions which "will" be made by companies in the event of a bad Brexit break up. They have to weigh the odds and, right now, they have not done enough investigation into the situation to make a definitive assessment either way.
What we do know is that the UK manufacturing is already selling to the rest of the world. Witness LandRover who sells a small % of it's vehicles to the EU and the vast majority to the UK and the rest of the world. Airbus, of course, is going to get it's wings and tailplanes from somewhere else, given that the only centres with the actual capability to manufacture them to the quality and size are the UK. Otherwise they'd never make them in the UK and transport them to where they are assembled.
I shall wait for all the buzzing nose to stop before I listen to what people are actually planning to do.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.