This is absolutely baffling me. Thirty two years ago there was a mass illegal picket at the Orgreave coking works in South Yorkshire. The police, in many peoples eyes, used vastly excessive force against the striking miners. Charges into them on horseback, hitting them with batons, etc.
Subsequently the police charged 71 men with riot and 24 with violent disorder. The judge threw the cases out of court, with police evidence being branded "unreliable". In 1991 38 miners were paid £425,000 in compensation by South Yorkshire police.
So you have to ask, why the calls for a public inquiry? The legal system worked, eventually. Nobody was convicted, the cases were thrown out, compensation was paid.
The only thing that I can see is missing is action against the police in charge on the day and any who used excessive force; the evidence for who what and where is readily available so if anyone wants to take out a private prosecution, do so (unless the compo deal included a waiver on that?).
What is a public inquiry going to achieve? It won't tell you anything that isn't already known, it's going to be massively expensive and it will produce nothing at all.
This wasn't Hillsborough; nobody died. Nobody got convicted, the judge rightly threw the prosecutions out and compensation was paid (not that the BBC actually bother to mention this). Plus, it was thirty two years since, for God's sake! The Orgreave plant was knocked down years since; all the mines are shut; the police who did this are long retired - what is the actual point of a public inquiry? It beats me.