TheOstrich wrote:I agree the initial sentence was too lenient.
But the thing is, the Parole Board must have assessed his case and decided that he is no longer a danger to women .....
Os, the orginal trial judge didn't have much leeway. John Worboys was only charged with one rape, despite the fact that after he was caught another 75 women came forward saying that they had been victims too.
This responsibility lies squarely with the Crown Prosecution Service and it's director at the time, Keir Starmer. Why wasn't the rapist charged with more? He isn't saying.
The judge tried his best by giving Warboys a minimum 8 year sentence but it was an "indeterminate" sentence, which meant he could have been kept in longer, but the parole board decided otherwise!
The parole board, Chair of which is Nick Hardwick. Last year Mr Hardwick said that prisoners
should not have to prove that they are safe before being released. (my bold).
That's what you're up against.
Link to story here. Scroll down til you get to it. Yes, it's a right wing website, but I don't think anyone is suing them...
https://order-order.com/