by Suff » 16 Mar 2018, 16:17
I agree, it was not handled well and the press is having a stupid brain dead media fest over it. Nerve Agent is not something you take lightly. Ever.
On the other hand, Russia has not helped the situation at all. The "other press" outside of the UK and the US, has been highlighting the fact that Russia internationally decommissioned its stocks of chemical weapons and it was signed off by UN weapons inspectors; they could simply have told the UK to go talk to the UN. Especially as we know how the whole Iraq thing unfolded. The fact that Russia did not makes them suspect #1.
These weapons are like Nuclear, they have signatures from their place of manufacture and the process used. That means the Government is 100% sure it is Russian Nerve agent and it can be validated from the samples taken by the UN when they certified the Russian stocks destroyed. What our government does not know is that this Nerve Agent actually came from the Russian government.
The circumstances surrounding prior Russian behaviour, a weapon only made there and a truculent Russia refusing to engage does not make a totally watertight case. Although the evidence is more than circumstantial. Russia signed off that these weapons were destroyed, that included confirming that none, anywhere, were left. At best it is a poor security issue in Russia post the Berlin Wall collapse. At worst it is what it is being called.
As for Corbyn? Round 1 he tried to use it as a political stick to beat his political rivals with. Resulting in condemnation from everyone but his closest allies in the Labour Party. His second attempt was much better but, given his first attempt, lacks sincerity. Corbyn gets a "do over".
The Government does not have that luxury and Corbyn does not have a hostile media breathing down his neck.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.