So it starts with
He won in a process that shortlisted him and four women out of a total of 27 applicants, leaving the MPC with just one female member, despite repeated criticism about the gender imbalance in the central bank’s senior ranks.
Using the usual bit about how only ONE female member is left to beat them up about balance...
But later on you get into the detail.
It tells you that the MPC contacted 88 people for the role. 44 of them were Women. Exact split right..
27 of those 88 applied.
Of whom 8 were women. Leaving 19 men. So of the 44 women approached, only 8 decided to apply. Immediate bias right? We should have approached 100 women and 44 men to get a balance right?
Well, actually, no, the MPC had a better idea.
Of the 19 men and 8 women the MPC created a shortlist of 1 man and 4 WOMEN. Extremely balanced right.
Then when the MPC finally selects the one man left standing, they are lambasted for not having enough women. It is not the fault of the MPC that women do not want to apply for the job. After all they took 50% of the women to shortlist interview and 5.23% of the men.
How much more balanced do we need to get? Right, I know, only invite Women. That'll fix it.