First move to oust May?

A board for news and views on what's happening in the world

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby TheOstrich » 11 Jul 2018, 16:22

Workingman wrote:So Leavers used their brains and voted for an ideal, did they? Shame that they weren't bright enough to realise that the ideal could not be delivered.


Piffle! :P :lol:

It would have been delivered by now if Cameron had had the conjones to invoke Article 50 on Day 1 after the Referendum and told the EU, no negotiations, go take a hike.

We could have then negotiated from there as equals, not as vassals. And simply walk away if the EU played silly b*ggers.

We needed a leader; we had a wimp and a coward duly followed by a closet Remainer bureaucrat who is still in power.

But not for much longer ..... :twisted:
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7582
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby TheOstrich » 11 Jul 2018, 16:25

Sovereignty, eh? What sovereignty did we lose? Our parliament still rules over civil and criminal law, welfare, the NHS, education, military and defence, policing and income tax and all the othere internal decisions made.


I see. And the European Courts of Justice and the European Courts of Human Rights and the European Parliament are what, exactly?
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7582
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Kaz » 11 Jul 2018, 17:08

Suff wrote:
It is I who should be mad, frustrated, raging at the mess and the debacle the remainers have made of Brexit.

.


Well if that doesn't take the absolute cake!!! Blaming the hideous mess that is Brexit on those who didn't want it in the first place! And don't quote Boris at me, Boris isn't sincere at all, he has his eye on No 10 and will say whatever it takes to get there :roll:
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43354
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Workingman » 11 Jul 2018, 17:38

TheOstrich wrote:Piffle! :P :lol:

Ouch, I have never been "piffled" before! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Seriously, though, and wrt the ideal. It must have been agreed by the Leave camp, I mean it would be silly to have people voting for many ideals in a binary vote - there could be 17.4 million of them. So when and where was the ideal published before the referendum took place?

Any working link pre 23rd of June 2016 will do. any.

Other post:

The ECJ is the EU top court and The ECJ upholds the Treaties and ensures that European law is interpreted and applied in the same way across the EU and to avoid differences of interpretation of EU law by national courts. A lot of its work is with trade disputes.

THE ECHR, for the millionthbillionthunpteenth time has sod all to do with the EU.

The European Parliament is the elected assembly of citizens of EU countries. It can change a law though it cannot propose a new one. In order to do that it has to ask the European Commission. The Commission carries out work everyday with the Parliament overseeing that it does its job properly. If it fails the Parliament can remove commissioners from their jobs or not allow them to spend the EU budget. Think HoL with teeth.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21749
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Workingman » 11 Jul 2018, 17:42

Kaz wrote:Well if that doesn't take the absolute cake!!! Blaming the hideous mess that is Brexit on those who didn't want it in the first place!

Kaz, it is deflection and refusing to take ownership. Brexiteers are world leaders at it.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21749
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Kaz » 11 Jul 2018, 18:03

So it seems.
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43354
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Suff » 12 Jul 2018, 07:19

Workingman wrote:
Kaz wrote:Well if that doesn't take the absolute cake!!! Blaming the hideous mess that is Brexit on those who didn't want it in the first place!

Kaz, it is deflection and refusing to take ownership. Brexiteers are world leaders at it.


No, that is deflection.

Remainers, both in government and in business and even some private citizens have made it their life aim to screw up Brexit as badly as possible. For differing aims I'm sure, but absolutely that.

To say that I'm blaming a small subset of people for trying to damage the country, as badly as possible, in order to get what they want is absolutely true.

To say that I'm taking the cake because 17.4 million people voted for Brexit, therefore likely damaging the country, therefore making the actions of a few remainers "OK" to smash the country to pieces in order to overwhelm that decision, is, honestly, taking the cake shop.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.
User avatar
Suff
 
Posts: 10785
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 08:35

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Suff » 12 Jul 2018, 07:34

Workingman wrote:Sovereignty, eh? What sovereignty did we lose? Our parliament still rules over civil and criminal law, welfare, the NHS, education, military and defence, policing and income tax and all the othere internal decisions made.
<snip>
So Leavers used their brains and voted for an ideal, did they? Shame that they weren't bright enough to realise that the ideal could not be delivered.


Workingman wrote:Sovereignty, eh? What sovereignty did we lose? Our parliament still rules over civil and criminal law, welfare, the NHS, education, military and defence, policing and income tax and all the othere internal decisions made.


Yes that's the one. Of course we rule over our civil and criminal law. Tell that to the Poles. What? Nobody reads the EU news in remain camp? Surprise me some more. Poland is already being sanctioned because their (supposedly sovereign), parliament decided to update their laws, get rid of the quasi communist decisions taken by those who had been deep in the communist era and get rid of those who grew up in communism from the top courts so they could get decisions based on the reality of a democratic state.

The EU response? Sanctions, threats (soon to be actions), to stop Poland from voting in the European Council and the Council of ministers, probably followed by the suspension of polish MEP's in the EU parliament. In short, binding Poland into the Union without the democratic benefits of the Union whilst still being a lucrative market to sell goods to (paid for by EU subsidies). Why do the Poles not just have a referendum and leave? Money, bucketloads of it, heading their way.

So don't tell me we're in control of our laws, because if the EU rules against the UK government then the EU ruling stands.

If you are not in control of your laws, you are not Sovereign. Welfare? NHS? Education? What we do with our military in peace time? Misdirection, just as you say I am doing. To be sovereign you need to be fully empowered to take decisions (any decision) and make it stick. Just ask Scots who want independence, they'll tell you exactly what it is.

As for not being able to deliver Brexit?

What is Brexit? It is the UK leaving the EU. Nothing more, nothing less. Any idiot can deliver that. All they need to do is trigger A50 and refuse to talk to the EU for 2 years. Job done. Brexit is delivered.

Ah, but you mean "sensible bexit", where everyone goes singing into the sunset with trade intact and no pain and the EU recognise that they can no longer tell the UK what to do. Well of course that could not, ever, be delivered. Not because the Leave campaign were a bunch of losers who had no clue what they were doing, but because the EU would have to "give" us that and the 27 self serving, back stabbing, ingrates in that cabal would never give the UK the steam off their excrement if they could possibly avoid it.

The EEC and the EU was explicitly set up for the original 5 to make the cream of anything they did. It was set up to block inwards trade whilst allowing, almost, frictionless trade internally. In short a competitor to the US and the USSR without the politics (originally). A50? It was a sop to Denmark to get the Constitution through and was kept in the Lisbon Treaty for the same reason. Otherwise it would have been Hotel California all the way. Because anything else would be hugely damaging to the original 5.

Of course Nirvana could not be delivered. We'd have to have crawled and begged and been spat in the face for our effort. That is not how the British I remember act. The British I remember would stand up, tell them to go have sex with themselves and walk off head held high.

The EU has created a generation of spineless weaklings in the UK just as it has created a generation of spineless weaklings all over the EU, except for the new entrants of the former Eastern Europe. That is what the EU needs. It does not want strong independent states, it needs weak,pliable,states.

Brexit, after I am gone, will be the defining moment for the UK in this century. As the decades unfold, post Brexit, the EU will become visible for all that it is. From the outside of the prison walls it will not look so good as from the inside.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.
User avatar
Suff
 
Posts: 10785
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 08:35

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Suff » 12 Jul 2018, 08:20

Workingman wrote:THE ECHR, for the millionthbillionthunpteenth time has sod all to do with the EU.


Correct. But it is reported in the UK press that way all the time and because those ononists can't get it right most people in the UK equate the Court (ECHR) and it's decisions, detrimental to the UK, with the legislation.

What should have bee said is the Charter of Fundamental Rights, containing the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, ruled over by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, set up by the European Convention on Human Rights (of which we are a founder member and signatory).

However, for most people, the decisions of the ECourtOfHR, based on the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, decided on by the EU, which we cannot overrule, is enough. What it boils down to is the ECourtOfHR decisions and our inability (not unwillingness but inability), to go against them.

As a founder member of the EConventionOnHR we deem ourselves bound by their decisions. However, as a sovereign nation we could, if we wished, secede from membership of the EConventionOfHR and create our own UKHR rules and courts.

As a Member of the European Union we cannot do that. Because the only way to get out of the Charter of Fundamental Rights is to leave the EU.

So, coming back to the very beginning, whilst not technically correct, Ossie is exactly right. To not be bound by the decisions of the ECourtOfHR, the UK has to leave the EU.

Workingman wrote:The European Parliament is the elected assembly of citizens of EU countries. It can change a law though it cannot propose a new one. In order to do that it has to ask the European Commission. The Commission carries out work everyday with the Parliament overseeing that it does its job properly. If it fails the Parliament can remove commissioners from their jobs or not allow them to spend the EU budget. Think HoL with teeth.


Ah, the parliament can propose changes to the directives of the commission. However the commission then has a vote on how to deal with it and the parliament cannot change that decision. The parliament does, as you say, have the power to make the entire commission resign, but that is a nuclear option which, it is unlikely, will ever be used, because it is the parliament who vote on the members of the commission.

Reading the TEU and TFEU, I'd say it has milk teeth. They can still bite but it might, in the end, hurt the person who bites, more than the person who is bitten.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.
User avatar
Suff
 
Posts: 10785
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 08:35

Re: First move to oust May?

Postby Workingman » 12 Jul 2018, 08:40

Poland, ah, Poland.

More spin and deflection.

This is the Poland that joined the EU and signed up to all its treaties, all its treaties not bits of them.

It then decides it does not like the bit where the judiciary should not be under political control so breaks a signed treaty. The EU then acts to keep a signatory of its treaty in line - the big, bad EU.

Poland had a choice: Join and play by the rules or stay out.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21749
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

PreviousNext

Return to News and Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests