So Samira Ahmed has won her case for equal pay for her work on Newswatch vis-à-vis Jeremy Vine on Points of View. He got £3,000 per show where she got *just* £440.
I have watched both and they are pretty much the same. People write in to, mostly, complain. The BBC then puts up a wonk who totally ignores the complaint and spends ages justifying the unjustifiable. So it is probably right that she should be paid the same as him.
However, the bigger question is why the BBC would be paying anybody, man or woman, £12,000 per hour, yes, per hour, for anything let alone reading out a few letters?
It is long past time that an independent body of viewers got in there and sorted out the BBC's pay scales.