Workingman wrote:
I do not have a problem with long term plans so long as they are analysed, alternatives debated, pulled to pieces, reassembled and analysed again the the nth. All of that has to be done by people in the know and not civil servants or special political advisers with degrees in origami and classics.
They have, sadly. Their assessment was that unless we reduced emissions to net zero and kept CO2 under 360ppm we were royally screwed. Anything over that and it just increased the screwedness.
Target date?
About 2000.
Today we are over 410ppm CO2 and heading for 450 at the fastest rate in the record (since the 1950's).
There is plenty of evidence that we need to do it, how is another matter. That should be reviewed. My take is that economic sanctions should be a tool too with China, India, the US and a whole raft of growing nations in the crosshairs.