Workingman wrote:real world data will help sort things out
WM you touch upon something that has been on my mind.
After all this is done(April next year according to the conspiracy theorists) there will probably be some sort of inquiry. Not an actual honest public inquiry, the manyfold failings of the British state during the pandemic need to be hidden by the politicians; but some sort of inquiry.
And what I'm wondering is this.
How are they ever going to get any meaningful data to process?
The definition of a Covid death means that Covid deaths will be over stated. A positive test in the last 28 days of life does not mean someone died of Covid; but it will be recorded as a "Covid related" death.
The lateral flow test used to test for Covid has been slated in the USA by their Food and Drug Agency for inaccuracy. In this country we are still ploughing ahead with it.
The NHS app id pinging people for being "in contact with an infected person" when the pinged person hasn't left the house for months.
I worked in IT for a long time and spent some years wrestling with data quality issues.
Looking at the standard of data available for the pandemic I can't see how they can draw any conclusions from it, apart from the broadest of generalisations.
It's an an old saying, but GIGO is still true. Garbage In, Garbage Out.