Sexual exploitation, refusal to use the word Muslim

[KateLMead]

Well it shows the hold that this supposed diversity has its effect on our language and indeed our country..
The filthy rotten disgusting Muslims and preachers who preach that English children and girls are the right targets for sexual exploitation as they are "Easy Meat".. are animals who should be handcuffed put on a plane and dropped on some Island away from civilisation along with the other offenders..
We are told that we must not upset the Muslims in our community.. Are the recent two major cases the only Muslim rings where children are being raped and exploited across the UK? of course they aren't, this filth is widespread, and we don't hear too many Muslims raising their voices in protest.
As for the chief of police and the forces who have ignored the pitiful cries of these youngsters along with the social workers and councils who refused to act, they should face prosecution made to stand down from their positions.. I would bang the lot up in Jail with every perv in the book who would gang up on them and give them a dose of their own
medicine

[Workingman]

Kate, I was going to start a thread yesterday about freedom of speech in the UK and its limitations according to PC rules. A newly elected UKIP councillor has been forced to resign because some twelve months ago he reposted cartoons of Muhammad on FB. It is not illegal to do so, yet the police raided his home and took away his computer for evidence of "hate crime".

On the other hand we have long had an open house to attack or make fun of Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism and other Christian sects, Judaism, Atheism and Agnosticism. We have a long tradition of such works and the sky has not fallen in.

But in the modern PC world there is protectionism/censorship. To not be actively pro - LGBT is equal to being homophobic. To be concerned about immigration is racist, and to have even the slightest dig at Islam, even when some of its adherents are committing the most heinous of crimes, is a hate crime.

[Aggers]

I have only just picked up on this thread, but it touches on a matter that has concerned me for a long time.

It is the way that we are so easily accused of "^^^-ism" nowadays. This state of affairs is, of course, a strategy
that has been deliberately contrived by minority groups in order to achieve their ends - ends which, not long
ago, would have been unthinkable.

Every day now, on the news bulletins, one can hear the results of this insidious process. Yesterday Scotland was
in the news because their church wants to allow priests to be "practising homosexuals" (the BBC's words). Today
the people we have elected to run this country are preoccupied with Gay Marriages,for God's sake.

I have come to the conclusion that unless the decent people in the world - and I believe there are still some - do
something about halting the slide down the slippery slope into the cesspit, then life will soon not be worth living.

Come to think of it, I'm not sorry that my own life on this planet cannot last much longer, but I feel so sorry for the
youngsters of today. God knows what life will be like when they grow up.

[Suff]

Aggers this is an insidious attack which, under current rules, cannot be stopped. Mainly because the way this attack is perpetrated, the normal and common people of the country are convinced that they are bad or evil people if they question minority politics. Demeaned, belittled, there can be no debate, only compliance.

On the other side of the coin, those minority groups have a differing standard applied to them. They can use words of hate, racism and division without being demeaned or belittled. This inequality leads to perpetuation of the situation.

There used to be one overarching rule in British society. It was called "Common Sense". If you had common sense you didn't need 95,000 rules and laws for every single topic of conversation. Common Sense ruled and regulated laws, inter race relationships and the general structure of our society. OK people abused this "unwritten law" but, in general, it worked for us. Serious breaches were dealt with by law, but, in general, common sense ruled.

So let's apply some common sense to Gay Marriage. The entire institution of marriage is designed to create the stability of the family unit and protect the children who are the next generation and the future of our nation. In the scenario of Lesbians, OK, there is some possible justification of this law, but for Gay Men???? Now let's take this a little further. Our country is virtually bankrupt because of a government which borrowed more than it could possibly afford to pay back and our economy has suffered a massive setback due to the world doing the same and now having to pay the bill. So, under common sense, what do we do? Well I'll tell you what we don't do, we don't tie the entire parliament up in some legislation which has already failed the common sense test in the first place.

When common sense exits and Political Idealism replaces it, then we are in serious trouble.

The question is not when it will end. The question is how do we get the ordinary people of Britain, those who grew up under common sense, to realise it is gone and it must come back??? Because only then will we see Britain return to something we recognise from our past. Something which may have been more direct, more "in your face" but also significantly more honest.

If we do not stop this then there can only be one possible end result. The removal of the word "Why" from the education curriculum. That has been seen before and it may have lasted for more than 70 years but it died by violence.

[cromwell]

Great post Suff.

[KateLMead]

Common Sense is not very common these days, it has been replaced with Common Purpose.

[Suff]

Hence we need it back or we continue down the spiral into destruction.

[Aggers]

You summarise the situation so well and so eloquently, Suff. How I wish we had people like you in Government.

If we do not stop this then there can only be one possible end result. The removal of the word "Why" from the education curriculum. That has been seen before and it may have lasted for more than 70 years but it died by violence.

You've lost me there. Can you explain?

[Suff]

You've lost me there. Can you explain?

In the USSR, the only question children were encouraged not to ask was "Why".....

[Workingman]

I wasn't only "why?" it was to question anything.

We have entered that world. Our children are taught not to ask, but to accept. If those in charge of informing say one thing, then what they say must be the truth - it is not to be questioned.

We have lost the plot, and those of us left who do question are silenced with accusations of being "...ists" or phobics. There is little debate any more, just the shouting down of those with different views.

I read quite a few blogs on various sites and the best way to close any debate is to insult and mark down.