Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson, is on a crusade to allow GM plants to be grown in the UK for food purposes. He says that GM crops are "probably" safer than conventional plants. Well now, that is a pretty big claim to make and yet on the R4 Today programme he was given a very easy ride on the subject.
In some cases he might well be right: there is GM and there is GM. But there needs to be a debate, and the debate needs to open and honest.
I am not totally against GM, depending on how it is done. Splicing a section of DNA from one strain of potato into another to make it resistant to blight is little more than we have been doing for centuries. It speeds up the lengthy and costly process of hybridisation as it does away with generation after generation of intermediates till the final hybrid is produced, which might well turn out to be a dud anyway.
However I am against splicing DNA from one organism into a totally different evolutionary line. This has been done already where the DNA of deep sea shellfish (shrimp) was introduced to a food crop to make it more resistant to frost. That, to me, is the nightmare scenario and the one we, and the environment, need to be protected from.