Bush and Blair.

[Workingman]

These two traitors, of their respective countries, are being allowed by the system to keep their deliberations about the invasion of Iraq a secret. They should both be in jail for war crimes....... after appearing a The Hague, of course.

What they should not be allowed to do, especially in Blair's case, is to make pronouncements on today's politics, and be given the oxygen of publicity by the media to do so.

[Kaz]

Absolutely right

[cromwell]

What they should not be allowed to do, especially in Blair's case, is to make pronouncements on today's politics, and be given the oxygen of publicity by the media to do so.

This has always puzzled me. Yes, Tony Blair should just get back under his rock and stay there; but why was he always given such an easy ride by TV interviewers? Why was he never pressed to give details when he just came out with meaningless slogans?

In cricketing terms, he was always given a series of slow full tosses down the leg side. Why?

He was at it again in the papers the other day, calling UKIP "nasty and unpleasant" and saying that they did "not have the answers for the 21st century".

OK then, are UKIP so nasty that they would launch an illegal war on Iraq and leave hundreds of thousands dead and maimed? He wasn't asked.

What are the problems of the 21st century then, and what are the solutions? Again, his empty slogan went unchallenged.

[Kaz]

It has always been the same, even before he got the leadership in the early 90s he was known as Teflon Tony - nothing ever seems to stick to him

[KateLMead]

Tony B'Liar the Peace Envoy.? I was in Baghdad when Saddam was in power. A terrible man but no worse in my opinion than B'Liar and Bush who cooked up their reasons to destroy a country leaving it in turmoil and civil war.
The tragedy of our troops who were sacrificed on these two criminals demands to attack the country with the ultimate aim to kill Saddam and his cohorts.
No mention is made of the over a million Iraqi men women and children killed unmercifully and maimed, any more than the tragic loss of lives of thousands of civilians in Afghanistan.
Now why did he go into Afghanistan supplying our forces with sub standard equipment. Ah yes his reasons have come to me
"To get rid of those poppy fields that are now producing bumper harvests"