TheOstrich wrote:Personally, I'd say right ..... I certainly wouldn't criticise the "ignorant" parents or dismiss the "misguided hysteria" .....
Difficult call Ossie. One child in a school and it could spread. but as was said in the article
'The reality is it’s a difficult disease to catch and much of its spread in Africa is to do with traditional burial practices when sufferers have died.
I'd say also the traditional practise of tending to one's own sick and not taking them to Hospital until they are well and truly infected. Thus putting everyone else in the family at risk.
Would you want to take the risk? Not sure. I don't think that his mother would have him in school if she had the slightest thought that he had Ebola. More like she'd be beating down the doors of A&E at the local hospital to get him tested and into treatment. She's clearly educated and knows a hell of a lot more about haemorrhagic fever than the parents in the school.
My inclination would be to talk to his mother first I think. Rather than try to exclude him. Hard to second guess what you would do when you don't know how the information has been put out there.
I see the sufferer in the US went downhill fast and died today. As normal, nothing they tried worked. I expect his fiancée is likely to be next if it has passed to her. We now have a 3 week waiting game to see how the US and Spain go. Then, perhaps, we'll all see how we react to the situation.