So why would UKIP be any different? They all promise the moon before they get into power
Quite right, Kaz, but for an increasing number of people, it's a way of registering their total dissatisfaction with the existing trio of parties, coupled with the fact that they do chime in with many people's underlying sentiments on immigration and the EU. The other three parties either support immigration and the EU (Libs) or hedge their bets (Cameron's broken promises / does anyone really know Labour's policies on these yet?
).
So, there is an element of choice which we haven't really had since Labour and Conservatives contrived to "meet up in the middle" and became images of each other. Blame Blair for that.
I know you're not a Kipper
, but for medsec and I, 'tis better to be a Kipper than vote for any other party that merely produces fudges and Red Herrings!
And if Farage gets into power but turns out to be little different than the others, well, at the end of the day, nothing really lost, is there?
If no Kipper stands in my consituency, Mr Toff Plebgate's, I might indeed follow WM's advice and do a NOTA, which is not a route I've gone down before ....
BTW, in the same way, "breaking the mold" was why I switched my vote to LibDem in South Somerset to elect Paddy Pantsdown back in 1983, not that that did any good in the long term - I certainly wouldn't vote for them now as I pretty much disagree with every policy they have these days. If Ukip can build a strong grassroots organisation (especially in the East of England) in the same way that the LibDems did back then in the West Country, they could become as successful as the LibDems ever were.