Workingman wrote:Given all the recent coverage of the "Snoopers Charter" that would be quite a hard admission for the security services to make. It shows, in some way, that all the intelligence in the world is of no use if it is not interpreted correctly and on time. For that reason I do expect it all to be post-event.
I think what is shows is the narrow band of monitoring on the communications net. Basically we are monitoring threats to NATO and the EU. When the plane went down they will have re-analysed the same comms chatter with broader terms and then found "bomb" and "Russia" and "plane or flight", a combination which was probably outside of the scope of our "bomb" and "NATO/EU" and "Plane" or "Flight".
BTW my post has now just hit and triggered the UK search....
Automated technology is only as good as the person or team who anticipate what they are looking for. Computers are the ultimate idiots. They will do exactly what you tell them to even if you really want something else. If you want something else, then you must tell them you want it.
I really feel for those Russian families more now. We have avoided this kind of thing in the Western world, mainly and so far, because our intelligence gathering is so good. Now I wonder how the information flow is going to go? Are we going to share with Russian and expand our scope to Russian flights? Because British people do fly on Russian flights, I know I have. Had we been looking and shared that information, those Russians might be alive right now.