I know we've done this before but a trend seems to be emerging.
Developers seem to want to select a nice, expensive rural village or town, buy land around it and stick up four and five bed detached houses which they then charge top dollar for.
In leafy North Yorks there is a nice little village called Green Hammerton. Developers want to build a "garden village" there. Actually, it's a new town the size of Tadcaster that they want to build there. Many big expensive houses are planned. Which won't do anything to solve the "housing crisis", because all the pressure is at the bottom end of the market, not the top.
A few nights ago the BBC did a little piece on Jaywick, a deprived town on the Essex coast. Some of the houses originally built as holiday homes for London people are in dire need of being knocked down and large parts of the town redeveloped.
Problem - developers don't want to do it. Why should they when they can sling up detached houses on green belt and coin the money in?
In places like Jaywick, why can't the council do some compulsory purchasing and build houses themselves?