I think that in the modern day there is quite a bit of semantic crossover between rockets, jets and gas turbines and also between the different ways propellers are driven.
Rockets: they do not breathe air, they are driven by an exothermic reaction between binary (or more) agents. Think Saturn 5 or Ariane. They carry their own fuel or in disposable tanks.
Jets: "real" jets are ramjets (scramjets, pulse jets. Air is necessary for them to work, but they have few, if any, moving parts. Think doodlebugs. They also carry their own fuel payload.
Gas turbines (jets): are a sort of hybrid. They have a rotating shaft containing all the parts.... except the fuel.
It matters not whether an aircraft relies on its forward momentum due to the direct thrust of a gas turbine or the thrust converted to torque to the shaft provided by a gas turbine in order to drive another means of forward momentum, a propeller, they are all gas turbine driven = "jets" for want of a better word.
I'll get the ex to dig out my old APs from my RAF fitter's course, if she still has them. They have some interesting figures from compressor pressure, to fuel flow in the combustion chamber, to turbine pressure and temp, to "thrust" at the exhaust nozzle. It is all pertty boring, but also interesting, if you are that way inclined.
Next up: Theory of flight. Anhedral and dihedral wings and leading edges. Book your seats now.