There are many reasons why the "grooming gangs" (aka rapists, drug suppliers and child abusers) have gotten away with it for so long.
Number one is the cult of "Diversity". Diversity is great; diversity is wonderful; diversity makes us what we are; there are no downsides to diversity.
That's the official line. Just google "diversity is at the heart of everything we do" and see how many hits you get, most of them from publicly funded bodies. There is no reason ever given as to
why diversity is so wonderful, it just
is. So to me,diversity is a cult that you have to believe in. Because if you don't, if you challenge diversity in any way in the public service, then your career is dead. Even the accusation of racism can kill a career.
So what happens when it becomes apparent that diversity in the shape of men of Pakistani origin are raping vulmerable white girls? Because that's certainly a downside of diversity, right?
What happened was - it got covered up. The Home Office researcher who was working at Rotherham council and who mentioned that most of the offenders were men of Pakistani origin was screamed at, told she must never mention that again and sent on a "diversity training" course. This was in 2002, her report being drawn up in 2001.
Why was a Home Officer researcher working at Rotherham council?
Because the Home Office definitely knew of the problem as long ago as 2001, and very likely long before that.Politicians knew about the problem then too. a very courageous lady called Ann Cryer, MP for Keighley, raised this issue also in 2002 - and was criticised by her own party for doing so.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... -ann-cryerTo pretend, as that gentleman from Kirklees council did last night on the news that"the problem of child sexual exploitation was not well known about or defined ten years ago" is demonstrably outright rubbish.
Politics has also played a part. In 2004 Channel 4 made a documentary about Asian grooming gangs called Edge of the city.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/ ... adcasting1The police in West Yorkshire persuaded Channel 4 to delay the showing of the film, fearing that the inflaming of racial tensions. Also the BNP thought the film was a recruiting boost for them - and local politicians did not want that.
Hopefully all the above shows that this problem was known about for years and that it was covered up for years, for many reasons.
Fear of being called "racist" or "Islamaphobic" and having your career ruined if you pursued these allegations.
Politicians not wanting to know about the problems - see Dennis McShane's admssion in the Ann Cryer link,
Fear of right wing parties getting increased support if the extent of the grooming issue was known about. Think on that for a minute; it was thought better to let the rape of vulnerable young white girls continue than to admit to the problem and let the BNP get some more votes.
And the cover up is still going on. In the past Police forces, social services, local councils and local politicians have all known about the problem and covered it up. Now the legal profession is doing it too. The trial in Leeds was conducted under "reporting restrictions" and these restrictions were only lifted when sections of the media challenged them.
It's a long and dirty story and very few people in authority come out of it with any credit. The suppression of the issue for so many years is a national scandal but the type of people responsible for the cover up are still running things, so nothing will get done. And how much of a scandal is that?