Workingman wrote:
TBH complaints against the ages being made equal are as rare as hen's teeth, just about everyone agrees that it was the right thing to do. The anger is about the "How" it was done. The WASPI case failed in court because they were going on about it being 'unfair and discriminatory'. Had they challenged the method and timing of its doing with facts they might have had more success. WASPI are now campaigning for a ‘bridging’ pension for women affected and that could work if they stick to facts and leave emotions out of it.
Frank it was the Back to 60 challenge in the High Court that failed, the media have got it confused. WASPI have always campaigned for a bridging pension, and never for the SPA to return to 60. That was always the fundamental difference between the two groups