A young teenager started vaping, under age, at 16. Some months later he developed hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and that eventually became so bad he was put in intensive care. It has taken him 14 months to make a 75%-80% recovery. It will have been devastating and very scary for the lad and his case has led to a sort of anti-vaping campaign with one doctor saying that:"we consider e-cigarettes as 'much safer than tobacco' at our peril."
Oh please. We all know that putting things in our bodies that have no real right to be there is a bad idea. That goes for smoking, alcohol, drugs, fats, sugar and even the chemistry set in ready meals, but let us beware of the language used and have some context, eh?
This lad not only vaped, but he did so using DIY 'juices' of unknown quality. He was a drug user and had smoked cannabis - so obviously your ultra average vaper.
As things stand there are no known deaths 100% down to vaping in the UK, but there are 220 per day due to smoking.
There has been "a spate" of deaths in the US - 39 over three years - with a further 2,000 'illnesses'(?) two thirds of those affected being under 21. Many of those who died were vaping THC, the active ingredient in cannabis. All this in a population of over 300 million.
OK, vaping is not "safe", but neither is crossing the road. However, the British Lung Foundation, the NHS and Public Health England all say vaping is about 95% safer than smoking and that: "in absolute terms it [the risk] is extremely small and, crucially, far smaller than that of smoking."
"The advice remains the same: if you smoke, switch to vaping; if you don't smoke, don't vape."
Focusing in on a few negative cases and blowing them up out of all proportion when compared to the overall picture is pretty poor form.