miasmum wrote:Just saying and now creeping away before I get insulted too
Who has been insulted, and by whom?
Cromwell, by a minority, but lately the movement has gained traction for some reason. As I have tried to explain, the deaths have to be recorded in some way. The 28 day thing was probably used because it is easy for the general public to understand. It's a rolling programme, day on day. It is probably not the best way to record things but it is a simple one-shot number.
Yes, we could have multiple charts, graphs and tables for every death of every description but nobody would take any notice of them. We are not all master statisticians.
Suff, deaths are on a similar trajectory to the ripple that started the second (third?) wave. They were generally flat from the end of August but they are now rising again.
Easing restrictions is possibly the right thing to do given Omicron, boosters, immunity, but we still need caution. I hope that observation is not insulting anybody.
Suff wrote: The flu epidemic of the millennium killed roughly 65,000 people.
Rubbish. Very high levels of flu were seen in 1999/00, when there were 48,000 excess winter deaths, not all of them flu. ONS report. On average flu deaths are between 10,000 and 25,000 - December to February.