So, the Met steps in.

A board for news and views on what's happening in the world

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby Workingman » 26 Jan 2022, 17:49

Meds wrote:The EEC vote was in in 1975...

Yes, and the campaign to overturn the result started the same day and ran for 41 years.

The same will happen with Rejoin. It will kick off and you will be thoroughly sick of it after about five years, but what's good for the goose..... :lol:

Suff wrote:Parliament was in chaos

You bet! 432 to 202 or 391 to 242 take your pick.
The Conservative ERG MPs have it, the Conservative ERG MPs have it.

UNLOCK!

Nothing to do with the opposition or DUP, the media nor the public, it was political avarice by her own ERG MPs who did for her. Even with her original 30 seat majority she would have still been Royally stuffed by her own side. But it was in-house and also what you Leavers wanted, so I guess that makes it OK.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby TheOstrich » 28 Jan 2022, 14:56

As I said upthread, a complete stitch up - Cronyism between Dick and the Government.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ray-report

The Met in particular should get their noses out of this enquiry and stick to something they can muck up safely, like weather forecasting. :evil:
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7582
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby Workingman » 28 Jan 2022, 15:35

Put me in Sue Gray's position with the present situation and I would have a few full and unredacted copies of what I had intended to report, along with copies of the evidence I collected, tucked away in separate safe deposit boxes known only to me. Dick and Johnson would be made aware.

Dick was promoted for two reasons, and neither of them had anything to do with her ability to do the job - tokenism.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby cromwell » 28 Jan 2022, 17:08

Workingman wrote:Dick was promoted for two reasons, and neither of them had anything to do with her ability to do the job - tokenism.

She has been a disaster.
Anyone else would have been sent to Rockall to be in charge of paperclips after the de Menezes fiasco. An innocent man shot dead by police in the middle of our capital city.
But she got promoted, at least twice.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 9157
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby Kaz » 28 Jan 2022, 18:48

TheOstrich wrote:As I said upthread, a complete stitch up - Cronyism between Dick and the Government.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... ray-report

The Met in particular should get their noses out of this enquiry and stick to something they can muck up safely, like weather forecasting. :evil:


This!! 100%
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: So, the Met steps in.

Postby Kaz » 28 Jan 2022, 18:49

cromwell wrote:
Workingman wrote:Dick was promoted for two reasons, and neither of them had anything to do with her ability to do the job - tokenism.

She has been a disaster.
Anyone else would have been sent to Rockall to be in charge of paperclips after the de Menezes fiasco. An innocent man shot dead by police in the middle of our capital city.
But she got promoted, at least twice.


This too.
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Previous

Return to News and Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests