No fine for Sir Keir

A board for news and views on what's happening in the world

No fine for Sir Keir

Postby medsec222 » 08 Jul 2022, 16:41

I am not sure what the difference is between one set of MPs having something to eat and drink at the end of a meeting and others sitting in a garden having something to eat and drink at the end of a meeting. But obviously there is a difference.
User avatar
medsec222
 
Posts: 986
Joined: 05 Feb 2013, 18:14

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby Suff » 08 Jul 2022, 17:40

Actually there was a difference. One set were at a location where they had worked and were expected to work on a daily basis. The others had gone somewhere for a meeting with significant travel and, then, had a beer after.

The first lot were all wrong and had to be fined. The second lot were, clearly, not doing anything wrong.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.
User avatar
Suff
 
Posts: 10785
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 08:35

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby miasmum » 08 Jul 2022, 17:58

Sanctimonious pair will be even worse now :roll:
User avatar
miasmum
 
Posts: 8456
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 23:03

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby medsec222 » 08 Jul 2022, 18:22

With hindsight this just proves how senseless and unworkable the rules were. That they were changed on more than one occasion did not help matters for most of us at home who were confined to barracks. I still think Rishi Sunak was unlucky when he arrived early for a meeting and hovered in the doorway for a few minutes, as it got him a fine for just passing through.
User avatar
medsec222
 
Posts: 986
Joined: 05 Feb 2013, 18:14

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby TheOstrich » 08 Jul 2022, 19:37

miasmum wrote:Sanctimonious pair will be even worse now :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Mrs O is still speculating Durham Constabulary's decision was politically motivated .... :evil:
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7581
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby Kaz » 08 Jul 2022, 19:51

He didn't break the rules, end of. They were electioneering and that was an exemption. The whole thing was a complete waste of the Durham police's time, and taxpayers’ money.
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby Workingman » 08 Jul 2022, 20:20

Entertaining, though, knowing that they would always be cleared and the Tory shills would be triggered. And so it came to pass....
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby miasmum » 09 Jul 2022, 10:09

TheOstrich wrote:
miasmum wrote:Sanctimonious pair will be even worse now :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Mrs O is still speculating Durham Constabulary's decision was politically motivated .... :evil:


Absolutely and what timing
User avatar
miasmum
 
Posts: 8456
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 23:03

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby cromwell » 09 Jul 2022, 11:34

Well unfortunately the Conservatives created the posts of Police and Crime Commissioner and let politicians stand for them. So the fact that Durham Police, controlled by the Labour politician and Durham PCC Joy Allen, didn't find the Labour leader Keir Starmer guilty is hardly a shock.
Whereas the Met Police controlled by Labour Politician and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan found the Conservative Leader Boris Johnson guilty.

Doubtless a coincidence.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 9157
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: No fine for Sir Keir

Postby Kaz » 09 Jul 2022, 11:38

Nope. He was electioneering the night before a by election. Exempt. Sorry if that doesn’t suit ;)
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43348
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Next

Return to News and Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: medsec222 and 68 guests