VAR

For the chaps here

VAR

Postby cromwell » 22 Jun 2024, 10:20

VAR was sold on a lie.
It was only going to be used to correct '“clear and obvious errors” or “serious missed incidents”'.

Well, if it takes you five minutes of slo-mo replays from many different angles to reach a decision, whatever happened isn't "clear and obvious".

France v the Netherlands last night.
The Dutch score and straightaway the joy of the goal is taken away by the dreaded "goal review".
Three or four minutes later, Judge VAR comes back with the verdict - the wrong verdict.

That shot was going in regardless of where the dutch player was standing, the keeper had no chance of ever getting to it. You wonder if some of these blokes have ever kicked a ball. Every ex-footballer on the BBC panel said "wrong decision".

"It's as though they are looking for reasons to disallow goals" said the BBC commentator plaintively.
Yes, and some of us have been saying this for months.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 8877
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 13:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: VAR

Postby Workingman » 22 Jun 2024, 11:06

It's a good shot but... a player is offside and could, possibly, impede the keeper. No goal - correct.

VAR = rubbish.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21328
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 16:20

Re: VAR

Postby JoM » 23 Jun 2024, 20:02

I hate it with a passion.

It takes away so much of the enjoyment when a goal is scored, you celebrate and then wonder if the tannoy announcement “VAR checking goal” is going to be made, and quite often it is and five minutes later you’re still wondering if the goal stands or not.

Crommers, we’ve been saying the same. Judging by the amount of time it takes for VAR to rule whether a goal should stand or not, it feels like they’re scrutinising every second of play leading up to the goal in an attempt to find a reason to disallow it.
At the centre of the Earth in the parking lot of the 7-11 where I was taught the motto was just a lie
It says "home is where your heart is" but what a shame 'cause everyone's heart doesn't beat the same
It's beating out of time
User avatar
JoM
 
Posts: 17521
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 00:06

Re: VAR

Postby cromwell » 30 Jun 2024, 10:02

Whoever is running the game (UEFA?) seems determined to bring in more and more technology, whether anyone wants it or not.
We already have VAR, we are going to get semi-automomous offside next season and we now have a "snickometer" to tell us if the ball has hit a hand or whatever.

i don't like it, it's sucking the joy and the immediacy out of the game.
They want to be careful, because between this and UEFA and FIFA inventing new competitions every year to sell to the TV, they might start putting people off football.
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 8877
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 13:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: VAR

Postby Workingman » 30 Jun 2024, 13:40

I suppose that in theory football could do away with linesmen (assistant referees). They will not be needed for off-sides and "snickometer" could decide who touched the ball last for throw-ins. Foul play, whether on the ball or out of sight of the ref. will be covered by all these cameras. Hmm, I guess that means we might be able to do away with referees as well.

Holograms instead of players?

Football moves into the Matrix.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21328
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 16:20


Return to The Shed

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests