by Suff » 19 Oct 2013, 08:30
Actually energy is a scarce resource. Always has been and always will be. It is only the current generation who have suddenly decided that there are "rights" that they "must" be entitled to.
It appears that the generations of people who saw us through the two largest wars this planet has seen, that would have been "ashamed" to expect that someone else paid their way in the world, are long, long, gone.
Whilst renewable energy is significantly cheaper to generate than any other, it is certainly not "free" and it sure as hell is not a "right". Nuclear power is the most expensive power that you can generate. I know this because one of my college studies was on nuclear power. Were the UK to transition to 100% nuclear power overnight, your electric fuel bills would rise significantly and that's just the running costs, forget the infrastructure build and maintenance costs.
Then what do we do in 40 years when the reactors reach their working life? Do what we have done today and say "They've got another 20 years"?
The biggest fault I see in this is lack of control on price rises against material and wage costs. Then again, if you listen to the energy companies, they only make around 5% profit. The only reason they can survive on 5% profit is because they are so large. You try running a business on 5% profit and living on it. Oh and on that 5% profit they have already paid 25% taxes....
If we want to control our energy costs, that is in our power. But we have to "invest" in the technologies to do it. Something we won't do. Solar electricity, Solar hot water, ground spike heating with a heat pump. They're all there.
Why don't people do it? Well because, over the long run, it costs them money NOW and Electricity and Gas are cheaper.
Then people complain about rising energy costs.
Whilst I recognise that many people live in situations where they cannot mitigate their energy costs alone and that some of these are very close to their income line, I also recognise that nobody is interested in working together with their community to create community energy projects which reduce their energy bills.
Oh and what we must also recognise is that if we go for community energy projects and reduce the energy we take from the grid, then when we do take energy from the gird, it will cost more. Those who do not mitigate their energy costs will face the full burden of the energy price rises.
Such is economics. The grid has to be paid for. The less of us who pay, the more it costs. The cost of the grid does not magically reduce just because we want to use less energy.
The single biggest thing the UK could do to avert higher energy costs is to part nationalise the energy companies and then provide infrastructure for them against profits coming back. That would put them on a level playing field with all of these competitor companies which are swallowing up EU power nets.
And I HATE nationalisation.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.