by Suff » 17 Sep 2015, 16:40
Well there is that bit about pragmatism. He leads a parliament of MP’s who are EUPhiles. No matter what he said during his campaigning, he believes he will have to work with them in order to provide a viable opposition.
If, in fact, he were the ultimately principled man that he was made out to be during his campaign, with the backing of over 60% of the party, then he would not do this. He would sit all the MP’s down, tell them that it was the party’s way or the highway (embodied by what he offered and what they voted for), then tell them that they either get behind him or be ejected from the party to become independents, be deselected at the next election and have to face a Labour candidate if they chose to fight the seat.
He has the time, he has the opportunity. He could do it. Even if they did get together and have a vote of no confidence and force another leadership election, I’d be willing to bet that he would come back with an even bigger majority in that scenario.
Instead he has chosen to “politic” his way through this, instead of standing up for what he said he stood for and forcing the others to either put up or shut up. That, I assume, will be his eventual demise. Because that is Blairite politics. Not fundamental left wing politics.
Blair may be gone, but the staff and advisors are all the same.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.